According to Andrew Tate’s management, they can’t make all the information public, just like the prosecution, because it might also impact the case. The most recent bail request for Andrew Tate, a British social media celebrity involved in a legal dispute in Romania with his brother Tristan Tate, was denied. The brothers have been in custody since December due to significant allegations against them, including rape, people trafficking, and gang organization. Follow the latest Andrew Tate News Updates with InsideSport.IN
Why can’t the Legal team of Andrew Tate disclose everything?
The Sartorial Shooter, Andrew Tate’s manager, recently appeared on a FreshandFit show on YouTube. He discussed several topics about the Tate brothers’ case.
Andrew Tate Defense Revelation: Why can’t Andrew Tate’s Legal team disclose everything Publicly ? Check more on Tristan Tate and Andrew Tate jail updatesHe said that because the prosecution could utilize the information against the Tate brothers, the legal team couldn’t publicly divulge every case detail. Additionally, they can use evidence and witnesses against them, upsetting Andrew and Tristan.
The inquiry into their actions has continued despite their denials of any wrongdoing, and the court has decided that they should be held in custody for now. A representative for Andrew Tate expressed unhappiness with the decision and said that his legal team would try to overturn the decision through an appeal.
The Tate brothers have a solid legal team
Last month, the Tate brothers strengthened their defense by hiring renowned legal counsel Tina Glandian. Mike Tyson, Michael Jackson, and Chris Brown are just a few of the A-list superstars that Glandian has previously collaborated with.
🛑 BREAKING
–
Tina Glandian (One of the Tate Brother’s international lawyers who has worked for Mike Tyson & Michael Jackson) gets interviewed by @piersmorgan and gives her stance on the arrest of The Tate Brothers‼️ pic.twitter.com/i0socKKJYY— Censored Men (@CensoredMen) February 1, 2023
When Glandian took over the case, she also raised concerns about the court’s routine judgment to reject bail since she thought it went against human rights regulations.
“This investigation has been ongoing since April [2022]. Today is February. Not even charges have been brought against them. We believe they shouldn’t be held at this time as it is a grave injustice. We believe it has now crossed the line to breaking international human rights legislation. There has been zero evidence provided. That is how we feel.”
Follow InsideSport on GOOGLE NEWS / For UFC News updates with InsideSport.IN