Home
Cricket
BCCI to reconsider IPL’s ‘Impact Player’ rule after Rohit Sharma’s concerns

BCCI to reconsider IPL’s ‘Impact Player’ rule after Rohit Sharma’s concerns

With the BCCI acknowledging concerns and a history of failed substitution experiments in other leagues, the future of the "Impact Player" rule seems uncertain. The IPL 2024's conclusion might see its removal or significant modifications to address player development concerns.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is re-evaluating the controversial “Impact Player” rule in the IPL, following criticism from Indian captain Rohit Sharma. This rule, introduced last season, allows teams to substitute a player from their starting XI during a match.

Rohit Sharma questions Impact Player rule

Rohit Sharma’s primary concern lies in the potential negative impact on all-rounders. In a recent interview, he expressed his reservations: “I don’t think it’s ideal… cricket is played by 11, not 12 players.”

He highlighted the example of players like Shivam Dube, who haven’t been required to bowl due to this rule, hindering their all-round development.

BCCIopen to discussions: Arun Dhumal

The BCCI, under pressure from Rohit Sharma’s comments, has adopted a more open stance. IPL governing council chairman Arun Dhumal acknowledged the need for review to The Telegraph: “We will definitely look into it… We are open to any discussion.” This suggests the BCCI is willing to consider abolishing the rule or modifying it.

There are various pros and cons to any rule that is in place. We are open to any discussion once the season gets over… nothing is cast in stone about its implementation,” Dhumal added.

Concerns beyond Rohit Sharma

Rohit Sharma isn’t the only high-profile critic. Jasprit Bumrah, another key member of the Indian team, raised concerns about the rule’s impact on bowlers. He believes it creates deeper batting line-ups, putting bowlers at a disadvantage.

Global trend of short-lived substitutions?

The “Impact Player” concept isn’t entirely new. Similar player substitution ideas have been attempted in other leagues like the Big Bash League (BBL) and by the ICC itself. However, these attempts were short-lived, suggesting challenges in implementation.

Focus on Player Development

The core argument against the “Impact Player” rule is its potential to prioritize entertainment over player development. The IPL, known for its innovations, shouldn’t come at the expense of nurturing well-rounded cricketers, a key concern for the Indian team as they prepare for the upcoming T20 World Cup.

More on Rohit Sharma:

Will the Impact Player Survive?

With the BCCI acknowledging concerns and a history of failed substitution experiments in other leagues, the future of the “Impact Player” rule seems uncertain. The IPL 2024’s conclusion might see its removal or significant modifications to address player development concerns.

Follow
Share

Editor's Pick

With Shami still unfit, India must look beyond pacer for bowling options in Champions Trophy 2025 Cricket With Shami still unfit, India must look beyond pacer for bowling options in Champions Trophy 2025

Top Stories

Share article
Follow us on social media
Tell us why didn’t you like our article so that we can improve on?
Choose ranking:
ICC Test Ranking
ICC ODI Ranking
ICC T20I Ranking
Bengaluru FC’s Top Goal Scorers Top 5 Clubs with Most Champions League Titles Virat Kohli Birthday: greatest knocks of Chase Master India’s Top Men’s Singles Badminton Players Bowlers RCB should target in IPL 2025 auction