Mark Butcher throws a wrench into England’s India Test plans, casting doubt on Ben Foakes’ inclusion despite his recall. The dilemma? Ben Foakes, considered England’s top gloveman, faces a potential squeeze amidst limitations in the squad.
Foakes missed the Ashes series as Jonny Bairstow reclaimed the wicketkeeping duties. While Bairstow performed well with the bat, some dropped catches posed challenges for England, especially in the first two Tests.
India’s turning tracks necessitate the best wicketkeeper, making Foakes a prime candidate. His seven Tests in Asia out of his 20 overall stand as testament to his prowess. Yet, Butcher argues, “I don’t see how they can play him.” The culprit? England’s lack of all-rounders.
With Ollie Pope’s potential absence and Ben Stokes batting lower, squeezing Foakes in disrupts the balance. Butcher paints a stark picture on Wisden Cricket Weekly podcast: “five specialist batters, Foakes at six, and then five bowlers… I just can’t see how they do it.”
Ben Foakes or Jonny Bairstow?
The crux of the issue lies in England’s dependence on bowlers. Missing all-rounders creates pressure to field a five-pronged attack, especially with inexperienced spinners and aging quicks like James Anderson and Mark Wood. This leaves little room for an extra batsman like Foakes.
Butcher acknowledges the conundrum: “Maybe the contrary nature of the game and of Bazball means they will find a way… but I cannot see how it’s done.”
So, will England prioritize their best wicketkeeper for the turning tracks, or stick with the five-bowler formula and watch Foakes carry drinks? The debate heats up as the first Test in Hyderabad looms on January 25th. Can England find a creative solution, or will they be forced to compromise on wicketkeeping quality?
Editor's Pick
Cricket
IND vs AUS 1st Test: Triple strike from Bumrah & co, Virat Kohli's redemption on India's radar on Day 2
Top Stories
