Home
Cricket
“Shan Masood reactive, not proactive”: Pakistan captain warned ahead of PAK vs ENG Tests

“Shan Masood reactive, not proactive”: Pakistan captain warned ahead of PAK vs ENG Tests

David Llyod has claimed that Shan Masood does not possess the character to tackle the Bazball threat posed by England in the PAK vs ENG series

Former England cricketer David Lloyd has questioned Shan Masood’s style of captaincy and has claimed that the player was more of a reactive skipper than a proactive one. His remarks come days ahead of the three-match PAK vs ENG series where the hosts aim to break free from the shackles of poor form. Shan Masood retained captaincy after facing a historic 2-0 series defeat at the hands of Bangladesh earlier in August.

“Shan Masood not a proactive captain”

In an interview with a local news platform, Llyod drew a parallel between Masood and other Pakistan captains and explained how he was unlike them. He opined that Shan was not the right person to lea Pakistan and believes that a captain would need to be proactive in order to tackle the Bazball threat. The PAK vs ENG Test series will get underway from October 7 with Multan hosting the first game.

Shan Masood is a reactive captain, not a proactive captain. I have seen his captaincy for Yorkshire. He is not like Pakistan’s former captains Imran Khan, Javed Miandad, Wasim Akram, Inzamam-ul-Haq, or Misbah-ul-Haq,” David Llyod said.

Latest news

Pakistan is yet to win a series under the captaincy of Shan Masood, having lost two out of two series played so far. Despite having the home advantage, Masood was not able to lead the hosts to even a single win, forget the series, against Bangladesh. With an eye on the WTC finals, Pakistan will aim to return to winning ways in the series against England.

Pakistan squad for PAK vs ENG

Follow
Share

Editor's Pick

What India Women's team need to do to make it to semis of ICC T20 World Cup?

Top Stories

Share article
Follow us on social media
Google News Whatsapp channel
Tell us why didn’t you like our article so that we can improve on?