Home
Cricket
Not just workload management! Coach Gillespie explains why Pakistan stars were denied NOCs

Not just workload management! Coach Gillespie explains why Pakistan stars were denied NOCs

Babar Azam, Rizwan and Shaheen Afridi are expected to take part in 9 Tests, 14 ODIs and 9 T20Is for Pakistan in the lead up to CT 2025

Pakistan cricket team’s Test coach Jason Gillespie justified the denial of NOCs for the likes of Babar Azam, Rizwan, Naseem Shah and others for T20 leagues. In an effort keep their players in the best shape for what will be a hectic international schedule, the PCB decided to ask is prime players to skip other leagues and rest instead. He added that while they did want to players to get the experience by being a part of various leagues, it wouldn’t be the case if it deterred Pakistan cricket.

Why Pakistan did not give NOCs to Babar Azam and co?

Gillespie did not mince any words when asked about how his relationship would be with the players.

We want players to go and play in these leagues and have these great experiences. But if we believe it’s going to be to the detriment of representing Pakistan in an upcoming series, then we’ll have a discussion and have a decision to make,” Gillespie told ESPNCricinfo.

“These are honest and difficult conversations. Ultimately, we’re tasked with doing what’s right by Pakistan cricket,” he added.

Pakistan denies NOC for Babar Azam and co

As per the press release, Pakistan has refused permission for the trio, keeping in mind that thy will play a crucial role in the remainder of the WTC matches, leading up to the Champions Trophy 2025. Babar, Rizwan and Shaheen are expected to take part in 9 Tests, 14 ODIs and 9 T20Is in the lead up to CT 2025 which will be held between February- March 2025.

Follow
Share

Editor's Pick

IND vs NZ 1st Test, LIVE Score: Rachin & Southee eat Indian bowlers before Lunch, lead 299

Top Stories

Share article
Follow us on social media
Google News Whatsapp channel
Tell us why didn’t you like our article so that we can improve on?